Filed under: Transactions
As I’ve been running through my Brian Sabean retrospective I’ve been running into some interesting things during the data crunching.
While checking into Sabean’s draft record I made a chart of every win share a team has drafted and how many of those were actually earned with the drafting team during his time using retrosheet, the Lahman database and Dave Studeman’s win shares database
But if you think that it takes around five years to start evaluating a draft, I was only looking at draft between 1997 and 2002, or six years. That works to compare Sabean against his peers, but not so well to get ideas of how franchises are doing at holding on to homegrown talent.
So I took it back to 1992 and ran it to 2006 (Lahamn doesn’t have retrosheet IDs for player debuting in 2007, which messes up the numbers) to get up to a better look and ran the numbers again. Here’s the full list:
Pct. of Drafted Win Shares Kept
Team WS Kept Pct TBA 496 380 77% PIT 734 544 74% PHI 1158 820 71% MIN 1164 795 68% MIL 740 466 63% OAK 1665 1019 61% HOU 1248 757 61% CHA 740 446 60% CIN 851 507 60% ARI 536 311 58% COL 1279 730 57% WAS 1092 620 57% ATL 868 470 54% ANA 871 470 54% TOR 1393 724 52% BAL 663 340 51% DET 995 500 50% SLN 1322 640 48% KCA 1213 563 46% NYA 756 319 42% LAN 599 251 42% SFN 956 390 41% CHN 710 289 41% BOS 1098 441 40% SDN 688 269 39% FLO 712 272 38% SEA 1159 435 38% TEX 1151 411 36% NYN 744 240 32% CLE 934 267 29%
Best Teams
What surprised me was that the top of the list was full of small and mid-market teams (Oakland, Minnesota, Pittsburgh) and the bottom 11 contained both New York teams, Boston and Los Angeles.
Minnesota did it by getting the most out of Tori Hunter, Corey Koskie and Jacque Jones with players such as Joe Mauer, Justin Morneau and Michael Cuddyer looking to add more value this year. Of course Hunter and Jones will help offset some of that.
The A’s appearance at the top has a couple of significant points. The first is that next time I do this I should include amateur free agent signings, which saves them from the loss of Miguel Tejada. The other is that Billy Beane and company have absolutely owned the draft and gotthe most out of their investments. Not only did they draft more win shares than anyone else they were sixth in keeping that talent.
The highlight of their list may be that through 2006 they’d won the Giambi battle, 166 to 118 win shares.The bad part is that their list is also full of players who still have years to contribute to the other side of the list, such as Andre Ethier, Jeremy Bonderman and Mark Teahen with veterans such as Eric Byrnes and Tim Hudson still productive (I hear Barry Zito is still hanging around somewhere, as well). It’ll be interesting to see how this group progresses and maybe in 10 years the A’s don’t look quite so well in this stretch.
Worst Teams
The Indians appearance at the bottom of the list is a function of two things; The cutoff date of the list and the players they picked up just before it.
The Indians had a great draft in 1989, picking 13 players who would make it to the majors, including Jim Thome in the 13th round and Brian Giles in the 17th. But Thome would end up blocking the two players who have contributed the most win shares to other teams from Indians’ drafts since 1992, Seasn Casey (145 win shares) and Richie Sexson (129).
Not surprisingly, the draft pick who has contributed the mos to the team is C.C. Sabathia at 77 win shares.
For the Mets, the big market team lowest on the list, the sin hasn’t been losing great players but a slew of role players. The top-3 who have contributed the most to other teams are Preston Wilson (102), Terrance Long (71) and Jay Payton (65). The two biggest misses on the list are A.J. Burnett (60) and Scott Kazmir, who should be much higher after the next few years if they can stay healthy.
The Rangers list was surprising to me mainly because I forgot they had drafted Rich Aurilia (160), Carlos Pena(39) and Aaron Harang (37). Losing Mark Texiera last year isn’t going to help when we look at this list next year.
And there is one big reason the Mariners are at the bottom. He resides in New York.
No Comments Yet so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
RSS Feed